[Skip all navigation][Skip header navigation]

Missouri State Government | DIFP Home | Insurance Home | Search | Site Map | Jobs | Help | Contact us
DIFP logo Matt Blunt, Governor
Douglas M. Ommen, Director

 

Skip navigation

Friday, May 16, 2008

Search Insurance


Advanced Search

Quick Links

Get Insurance news fast by
Joining our mailing list


Insurance Home

08-03: Annuity Actuarial Issues

To:            All Life and Annuity Insurers

From:        Linda Bohrer, Director; Fred Heese, Director

Re:           Annuity Actuarial Issues

Date:        February 7, 2008 (Amended February 22, 2008)

 

The purpose of this bulletin is to clarify some of the laws affecting annuity contracts issued in the State of Missouri, as well as to remind carriers of certain provisions in the law. It is important that carriers have specific, consistent guidance on these issues that are of special concern to Missouri, including those resulting from administrative and other differences among states.

 

1) FPDA Valuation Interest Rate

Some insurers have erroneously ignored future interest guarantees on annuity considerations in determining the maximum statutory valuation interest rate if those guarantees did not exceed the long-term life insurance maximum valuation rate. Valuation interest for flexible premium deferred annuity (FPDA) contracts which guarantee interest on future considerations (and variable FPDA contracts with one or more accounts that include fixed interest guarantees) must consider those guarantees, even if the future guarantees are below the long-term whole life rate. This can result in a maximum valuation rate which is 0.25% lower than the maximum valuation rate permitted for single premium deferred annuity (SPDA) contracts. (See RSMo §376.380.2.(3)(c) .)

 

2) Cash Values in Deferred Annuities

The Standard Nonforfeiture Law for Deferred Annuities (SNFL), RSMo §376.671 and §376.669, do not permit reductions in cash surrender value except for loans and withdrawals. Any non-variable deferred annuity contract whose cash value formula could result in a decrease in cash value would violate RSMo §376.671 and/or §376.669. The Commissioner’s Annuity Reserve Method (CARVM) which calculates reserves for deferred annuities must presume that the cash values do not decrease. (See RSMo §376.380.1(2)(e) .)

 

3) Annuities with Market Value Adjustments (MVAs)

The Standard Nonforfeiture Law for Deferred Annuities (SNFL), RSMo §376.671 and §376.669, do not permit cash surrender values to decrease (except for withdrawals and indebtedness). If a market value adjustment (MVA) has the potential to reduce cash surrender value below a previously credited amount, it violates RSMo §376.671 and/or §376.669.

 

Further, the maximum potential a MVA would have to be valued in setting CARVM reserves under the Standard Valuation Law, RSMo §376.380.1(1)(e). This law requires the actuary to set reserves equal to the greatest possible present value of future benefits.

 

Annuities with MVA features that comply with 20 CSR 400-1.150, the Modified Guaranteed Annuity (MGA) Rule, avoid violations of the two situations described above. Having the MVA annuity in a separate account avoids violation of RSMo §376.671 and §376.669, and avoids having to consider the maximum potential value of the MVA in CARVM.  Annuities with MVA features that do not comply with the MGA rule will be considered in violation of RSMo §376.671 and/or §376.669 and the Standard Valuation Law, RSMo §376.380.1(1)(e), regardless of any caps, floors, or limits on the MVA.

 

Reasonable equity requires that downward adjustments in cash surrender values must be similar in magnitude to upward adjustments that take place when changes in reference interest rates are similar in magnitude. (See 20 CSR 400-1.150(5)(A)3.)  MVA formulas should not include penalties for surrender that unreasonably exceed expected changes in market values of investments. In typical MVA formulas, loads greater than 0.25% tend to produce unacceptably inequitable and excessive downward adjustments in cash value.

 

A separate account does not automatically require Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration as a security.  The SEC determines registration requirements.  It does subject the contract to the state rules regarding variable contracts, including company and agent licensure.

 

Any questions should be addressed to:

 

David J. Hippen,  FSA, MAAA, FLMI

Life & Health Actuary.

Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration

301 West High Street, Suite 530

Jefferson City, MO 65102

573-526-4983

David.Hippen@insurance.mo.gov